·
What
did you notice about your students’ participation and learning in relation to
your objectives?
I
noticed that both of my students met my reading lesson objectives at different
rates. Chad was more successful
throughout the activities than Jake. Throughout
every activity of the lesson Chad was able to demonstrate one-to-one
correspondence. No matter what form the
sentences were presented in he was able to point to each word as we read them
aloud together. The only two words that
Chad struggled with were “into” and “a.”
When these mistakes were made I went back over the sentences with Chad helping
him point to these words as they were read aloud. The second time these words occurred in the
text Chad was able to correctly point to the words as they were read. In contrast, Jake was only able to demonstrate
one-to-one correspondence when they words were presented on different note
cards or in different colors. When we
were reading the text from the book aloud together he was not able to point to
each word. Instead I worked with him,
pointing to each word simultaneously. If
I was to work with Jake for more reading lessons I would print out copies of
the pages and highlight each word with a different color. Once he had experienced one-to-one
correspondence in this presentation multiple times I would want to move on to
highlighting every other word. Hopefully
this would give Jake experience pointing to each word in regular text
font. Then the teacher could work with
him with text words that are all black.
Both students were able to use picture frames to find words within
sentences on a page in the book. Chad
was able to meet my objective during every activity while Jake was only able to
meet the lesson objective during curtain activities.
·
What
were the strengths and limitations of your lesson for supporting your students’
learning?
My
lesson had strengths and weaknesses. One
strength was that the students liked the book I had selected and were
interested in reading it along with me.
Both Chad and Jake wanted to demonstrate one-to-one correspondence so
that we could continue reading and find out what happened in the story. Another strength of my lesson was the number
of activities I was able to include that incorporated one-to-one word
correspondence. The students were able
to practice this skill in multiple forms and see that it doesn’t matter what
form the sentences are displayed in there are always made up of words. The size of the reading group was also a
strength. I was able to focus on the
learning needs of the two students.
There wasn’t a large group of students I was trying to monitor
throughout the entire lesson. Therefore,
I was able to recognize that Chad missed the words “into” and “a.” Then I was able to take the time to model how
to point to these words as they were read.
In addition, I was still able to monitor Chad, who was very successful
throughout the lesson, while providing more support to Jake. If I had taught the lesson to a large group I
would not have been able to address Jake’s learning needs and offer as much
help as I did. A weakness of my lesson
was that I was able to not modify Jake’s book on the spot to meet his
needs. If I had used a printed out
version of the book and had highlighters on hand I could have quickly
highlighted each word in a different color.
This modification would have helped Jake demonstrate one-to-one word
correspondence throughout the reading of the book.
·
What
did you notice about yourself as a teacher? What questions do you have?
I noticed that I was able to successfully monitor
both students throughout the lesson. Even
while I was helping Jake point to each word I still was aware enough of Chad to
notice his mistake while point to each word.
Then I was able to see him point correctly to the words “into” and “a”
after I modeled how to point to these words as they were read aloud. If the mini reading lesson group had been
larger this would have been more difficult to do successfully. I would have missed many of the one-to-one
correspondence each student exhibited. I
also noticed that if I was not able to monitor both students simultaneously I
made sure that each student got a chance to demonstrate their activity to
me. I made sure that was able to see how
each student completed the activities. I
also noticed that I was able to successfully choose a book that would allow
students to meet my lesson objectives but also keep them interested. Where the
Wild Things Are by Maurice Sendak is liked by many students
but also had simple sentences on each page.
There weren’t lines and lines of text in which students could lose their
place easily.